The comparative sequential method
Keywords:
Event, sequence, process tracing, comparative historical analysis, causality, temporalityAbstract
In this article, we argue that the comparative sequential method is the overarching methodology of comparative historical analysis. In comparative historical analysis, the «cases» studied can nearly always be decomposed into sequences of events. In such sequences, the researcher can study the causal links that connect events among themselves (in the type of sequences that we call causal sequences), or the causal link that connects the succession of temporal events (where either the order and/or the speed of events might consequential) with the outcome of interest (these are the sequences that we call strictly temporal). To develop our argument, in the first part of the paper we present the conceptual building blocks of our method: occurrence, event, sequence, and process. In the second part, we show that process tracing and Millian comparative methods can be applied to the analysis of different types of sequences. Thus, the article combines the literature on temporality with the literature on case-study methods of causal inference.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Tulia G. Falleti, James L. Mahoney
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
It is a condition for publication that the author or authors assign the reproduction rights to the journal, as well as the right to be the first place of publication of the article.
Articles published by Revista SAAP are distributed under a License CREATIVE COMMONS 4.0 ATRIBUCIÓN-NO COMERCIAL-COMPARTIRIGUAL INTERNACIONAL(CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) that allows third parties to use what is published, as long as the authorship of the article and the first publication in this journal is mentioned. Authors retain copyright.
Authors should carefully consider the list and order of authors before submitting their manuscript. Any addition, deletion or rearrangement of authors' names in the authorship list should be made only before the manuscript has been accepted and only if approved by the Director of the journal.
In case of allegations of scientific misconduct or conflict of interest, authors should send a letter to the Director of the journal explaining the case to REVISTA@SAAP.ORG.AR.